400004922.pdf - ????
?????Course outline. ??????????????????????????????????????????????????. ???? 
??? ????????????? ???? ?????? ...????PMDA???????????????????????14???. ?192????????????16?4?1???????? ?PMDA???????????? ... ??25??????????. ?1 ????. ?2 ???????????????. 1 ??. 2 ??????????????????????????. ????????????????? ... ?? 25 ????????????1. ????????????????40?9?16???????????4?????????????. ???????????????????????????? ?? 25 ???? - ?????????????????????????????????????????????????. ????? ????????????????? ... ??????????? ??25??????????????? ...??????? 29?9?27????71?7?1139???????? ... ??25?4?17???????????. ???????????????? ... ???? - ???? ?????... ?? 25 ? 9 ? 4 ???????. ????????????????????????????????????????87?? ?? 31 ?????? ... ????B(??????)... ?????48?4?4??. ?3? ??????????? ??????25?9?4??. ?4? ?????????? ??????27?12?16??. ?5? ??????? ... 4 All. Rajesh Kumar Giri Vs. State of UP & Ors. 359It is settled law that at the stage of summoning or framing of charge, the accused cannot ordinarily invoke section 91. IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPURThe Court observed that the case was fixed for deciding the bail application No.170/2021 and till then the chargesheet was not filed and ... 1. Child in Conflict with Law v. State of Karnataka, 2024 SCC OnLine ...The order was appealable under Section 101(1) of the Act. However, no appeal was filed. A revision was filed before the High Court under Section 397 read with ... 2024 INSC 978 - Supreme Court of India... Court held that the ground of non-compliance of statutory provision which was very much available to the parties to raise but did not raise ... May 9, 2023 + W.P.(C) 2499/2018 PRADEEP KUMAR SINHAchargesheet/charge memorandum not having approval of the. Disciplinary Authority would be non est in the eye of the law. Same interpretation ...
